ff35e5ef86
We currently use a full barrier on the sender side to to avoid receiver tasks disappearing on us while still performing on the sender side wakeup. We lack however, the proper CPU-CPU interactions pairing on the receiver side which busy-waits for the message. Similarly, we do not need a full smp_mb, and can relax the semantics for the writer and reader sides of the message. This is safe as we are only ordering loads and stores to r_msg. And in both smp_wmb and smp_rmb, there are no stores after the calls _anyway_. This obviously applies for pipelined_send and expunge_all, for EIRDM when destroying a queue. Signed-off-by: Davidlohr Bueso <dbueso@suse.de> Cc: Manfred Spraul <manfred@colorfullife.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> |
||
|---|---|---|
| .. | ||
| Makefile | ||
| compat.c | ||
| compat_mq.c | ||
| ipc_sysctl.c | ||
| mq_sysctl.c | ||
| mqueue.c | ||
| msg.c | ||
| msgutil.c | ||
| namespace.c | ||
| sem.c | ||
| shm.c | ||
| syscall.c | ||
| util.c | ||
| util.h | ||