No bug. The way wcsnlen will check if near the end of maxlen
is the following macro:
mov %r11, %rsi; \
subq %rax, %rsi; \
andq $-64, %rax; \
testq $-64, %rsi; \
je L(strnlen_ret)
Which words independently of s + maxlen overflowing. So the
second overflow check is unnecissary for correctness and
just extra overhead in the common no overflow case.
test-strlen.c, test-wcslen.c, test-strnlen.c and test-wcsnlen.c are
all passing
Signed-off-by: Noah Goldstein <goldstein.w.n@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: H.J. Lu <hjl.tools@gmail.com>
08cbcd4dbc